Keywords
Clear

NEWS...
most recent
|
most popular

main image

May 24, 2010

A significant number of Queensland motorists can expect to pay up to 12 cents per litre more for petrol if the State Government’s proposed ethanol mandate is introduced, according to experts.

Under the proposed mandate, five percent of all regular unleaded petrol sold in Queensland must be ethanol blended E10 by January 2011.

The ‘Against Ethanol Mandates Alliance’ (AEMA) says the mandate will reduce the availability of regular unleaded petrol, forcing consumers with incompatible vehicles and engines to purchase premium unleaded.

Australian Lot Feeders' Association President and alliance member, Jim Cudmore, says the major fuel retailers have already begun phasing out regular unleaded with 34 percent less sold in the state since the Government announced the mandate in August 2006.

“More than 20 percent of Queensland vehicles are unable to use ethanol blended fuel. Motorists with these cars will be forced to pay more for premium unleaded as regular unleaded becomes unavailable,” Cudmore says.

“There will be less choice for consumers as the only alternative to E10 is premium unleaded which will either force consumers to pay more, purchase new cars or undertake expensive modifications,” he says.

MANDATE TO AFFECT ‘MOST QUEENSLANDERS’

The news is no better for owners of E10 compatible cars, with drivers forced to pay more for fuel as the discount at the bowser for E10 does not offset its inferior fuel economy compared to regular unleaded petrol.

“Ethanol contains less energy than regular unleaded petrol which means fuel consumption is higher by around 3 percent. Increased fuel consumption means fewer kilometres per tank of fuel, so customers will simply have to buy more fuel,” Cudmore says.

Queensland reportedly uses 200 mega litres of regular unleaded fuel per year with a significant amount used in small engines.

“Marine outboard motors, scooters, vintage cars, small aircraft, many motor bike brands, pumps and much industrial and farming equipment are not E10 compatible due to ethanol’s highly corrosive and moisture attraction properties,” Cudmore says.

As a result, he insists the mandate “will affect almost every Queenslander”.

More costly to produce than petrol, ethanol also requires purpose built storage, distribution and transport infrastructure upgrades to handle its corrosion capabilities.

Cudmore adds that these expensive fuel distributor and service station infrastructure upgrade costs will also be passed on to consumers through higher fuel prices.
COMMENTS (4)
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
There is one reason only for Ethanol Mandating. Sugar cane lobby.
What's the carbon footprint of producing a tone of cane, even before the energy intensive conversion process to change it to fuel and get it to the pump.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Ethanol fueled or partially fueled cars is not the answer. Remember this is a grown product which will then replace food crops as ever more cars use the stuff - then food prices rise. So you have higher food prices - higher fuel prices while replacing one (or several) environmentally bad elements with one (or several) other equally bad elements. Electricity powered cars at present technology is not the answer. Compressed air looks good though - maybe too good for the automakers and oil companies eh?
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Ethanol additives have been designed to reduce the corrosive wear to valves and seals. While there are many cons as to reject the use of ethanol in gasoline, the environmental damage is less and consumers should get rid of their old jalopies and take advantage of government incentives for more fuel efficient vehicles or switch to electric vehicles. If all you do on average is drive to work and stop at the store for bubbly and veggies then chances are the petrol in your tank can be replaced by efficient electricity or compressed air. Each type is not just economical, enabling daily commute to less than $2 but also alot less caustic to the environment and that is what governments want to do is lower the carbon content of world climate. there is no room for whining only adapting to change. We all need to do our part.
Comment by Unknown
posted 1 year ago
Read www.opei.org/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/1926, which is the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute report on the damaging and dangerous effects of E15 on open cycle engines.

Read www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/business/energy-environment/05ethanol.html?src=busln which is the article Automakers Seek to Delay Ethanol Blending Raise, whereby automakers' new testing shows damage to about half the vehicles tested when using E15.

It's not just about cost. It's about the dangers of ethanol.

There's many more references I have as well, including, an official at the Washington State Dept of Ecology told me directly in 2008 that any more than 2% ethanol in our fuel and Seattle exceeds EPA ozone attainment levels. That's correct, ethanol causes ground level ozone pollution, and ozone causes pulmonary disease and death.

Add Comment
SUBMIT COMMENT


Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Queensland Business Review - AT A GLANCE
Home Weekly Insolvencies Book of Lists Queensland 400 Women in Business